this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
726 points (99.7% liked)
Greentext
8368 readers
294 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He knew those things to teach you but didn’t like Star Trek? Was he a Star Wars fan?
I don't think Star Trek is very hard sci-fi.
Edit: to say that, I don't think an interest in physics will naturally lead you to space fiction. And I don't think "space" is the natural conclusion of "physics."
Compared to Star Wars, Star Trek is pretty fkin hard scifi.
Star Trek isn't hard hard scifi, no, there's a bunch of completely soft fantasy elements like the holodecks and whatnot, but compared to Star Wars, it's still pretty hard.
I could see a person who reads and cares about scientific non fiction content might be easily bothered by how often reversing polarity solves the problem.
Some people just don't like consuming fictional content as a passtime.
"We're both reversing the polarity. There's two of us. I'm reversing it, you're reversing it back again; we're confusing the polarity!
No, he was a physicist. So he used examples of warp drive and time dilation along with why there is a Heisenberg compensator in the transporter.