this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
303 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85571 readers
3508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 45 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

World's first ex-trillionaire , yes?

[–] abc@suppo.fi 1 points 3 hours ago

No, SpaceX's valuation hasn't really decreased significantly. Musk is still comfortably a trillionaire.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 13 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Nope. Since everyone bought his shares he got to keep their money

[–] abc@suppo.fi 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's... not how this works.

People give him 170 to 300$ for worthless share. He get to keep this money, now the valuation on the shares he have got up because ~~people~~ hedge fund were fighting for the useless one. Now when the dust settles we will see how Musk will do but in any case he got out with a filthy bunch of money

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

By that logic he's not a trillionaire at all. They only sold 4% of the company for some 68 billion USD. A trillion dollars was never liquidated.

Edit: 4.3% and 75 billion are the correct numbers.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

He gets to borrow against the shares as if he has that trillion in cash.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 2 points 26 minutes ago

I wonder what his will looks like. Who gets to keep it all if he ODs on Ketamine.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah sure I also think that he is a trillionare at the moment. I was just trying to show that it's absurd to say he has the money even if the stock price falls because he's already liquidated it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What moron bank would lend against no actual collateral.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago

Almost all of them. That's how the Epstein class fund their lifestyles, they borrow against their stocks. This is why the Epstein class always want low interest rates; it is not about mortgages, at least not the kind where someone is homeless because they missed a payment.

https://taxproject.org/carried-interest/