this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
1254 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 50 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Never idolise. Courts simply apply the laws, and good laws were likely written by inspired people and approved in a good political climate. These two conditions are not static.

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

In this case, the title is misleading. It's not the ECJ, it's the ECHR. The ECHR isn't part of the EU even if the EU and the EU members recognize it.

The ECHR rules according to the ECHR and not the EU regulations. The court can overturn EU regulation when violating the Human Rights.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I didn't open the article before, and you are right. The author of the article lives in Chicago; I think that Ars has no European writer to really understand what they are talking about.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Well, European Union member states have as a criteria of membership to also be members of the European Convention of Human Rights (which is the one the ECHR rules on), but that's about it.

[–] THE_MASTERMIND@feddit.ch 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know i guess i wanna support so they have motivation to go forward. But yes you are absolutely right.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We are always on the brink of ruining everything nice that we have been slowly building.

You can read here about the plans of the European Commission to enable service operators to mass scan all the users' private messages in search of illegal materials.

The Commission is the same super-government body that signed privacy-oriented things like the General Data Protection Regulation.

[–] THE_MASTERMIND@feddit.ch 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah i kinda did hear about it and was suprised. But figures can't have anything nice nowadays anyway