Technology

59569 readers

4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

318

The Google Pay app is shutting down in the US (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 9 months ago by catculation@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think they could 🤔

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It would be trivially easy.

Request for www.taylorswift.com

Return IP to client for a dynamically created temporary web page that shows a Ticketmaster.com ad with a countdown of 10 seconds and javascript redirect to the actual taylorswift.com IP

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But, HTTPS certificates.
Unless they provided overrides for their ads in Chrome, but at that point why do it with DNS.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Google is way ahead of you, they are a certificate authority now, so in theory they can do this right now. Take a look at any site's https certificate and a significant portion of them are now signed by Google Trust Services LLC thanks to Cloudflare using them to generate free https certificates (in addition to letsencrypt). Note that they won't ever pull this trick though because it'll irreversibly damage their reputation.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think they wouldn't do that, since they could do the redirect within Chrome itself. The only reason they would do this is to grab users on other browsers, but that would mean everyone else stopping to use Google DNS, which means less data to collect or sell.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The only reason they would do this is to grab users on other browsers,

Yes that would be the purpose.

but that would mean everyone else stopping to use Google DNS, which means less data to collect or sell.

I agree, which is why I also agree with you why they haven't done it yet, but I was speaking to how they could do it, not the fallout from them doing so.