Technology

59569 readers

4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

347

College student put on academic probation for using Grammarly: ‘AI violation’ (nypost.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

College student put on academic probation for using Grammarly: ‘AI violation’::Marley Stevens, a junior at the University of North Georgia, says she was wrongly accused of cheating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

... No proof she didn't? What could possibly prove that?

Can you give me an example of this proof? And if so, is that something reasonable for a student to have?

Seriously, think it through.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If you write something in Word or an equivalent program, there will be metadata of the save files that shows creation and edit timestamps. If they use something like Google Docs, there's a very similar mechanism via the version history. I actually had the metadata from a Word document be useful in a legal case.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ok, and that's proof of what exactly? That you made the file when you said you did?

Not to mention, you can set those to whatever value you want

I can see how it could be part of a court case, because it's one more little corroborating detail. It doesn't prove anything though

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The edit history would show things like copy/pasting large blocks of text versus normally typed edits.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago

A quick search shows you can edit this as well... That is interesting though, I didn't know it existed

Give me a couple hours and I could build something that makes pastes appear to be keystrokes. Give me a weekend, and I can build something mathematically indistinguishable from a human typing that will hold up to intense scrutiny

It still doesn't prove anything, it's just one more piece of circumstantial evidence. Still, it's not unreasonable to paste the full text into it, or mix and match. Maybe you don't have word installed on your computer - I don't, I haven't since I was in school myself. It's reasonable to use word on school computers but do all of the work on an online text editor, then pasting into word on a school computer