this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
731 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The trouble is we end up having to install both when we could be only using Signal

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same goes for people who you convince to install Signal. They'll end up never using it because they just forget about it and they're not the ones who wanted to use it anyway. Being able to message people on WhatsApp through Signal would also make it a lot more easy to convince people to install it.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

And once those people have it installed, they'll talk to each other using signal-to-signal as opposed to signal-to-whatsapp!

It pretty much solves the chicken and egg problem, and yet they're scoffing at it as a solution. IMO it's a big mistake.

[–] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Using only signal in such a scenario is like using only whatsapp today, to chat with whatsapp contacts. What are you hoping to gain?

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

But it's not the same - there's a community of people doing the same thing, and with those contacts you'll be using Signal.