this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
232 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
232
Swarms of AI "killer robots" are the future of war: If that sounds scary, it should (www.salon.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Swarms of AI "killer robots" are the future of war: If that sounds scary, it should::Commentary: Are we sure AI-guided weapons systems will obey human commands?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Everyone's thinking of drones dropping bombs, but they aren't thinking of the true horror; kamikaze micro drones. It doesn't take much to kill someone, and micro drones can be wicked fast. Imagine a swarm of drones the size of a finch or smaller, each carrying a tiny explosive. Imagine these drones flying next to people's heads and detonating themselves. You could clear out a whole building with very little structural damage.

[–] FallingLights@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/9fa9lVwHHqg?si=QL_L7T1au1krcEUv

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s horrifying. I was thinking of this one:

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://m.piped.video/watch?v=pbGxYoxpPdI

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

You're thinking of kamikaze finches and I'm thinking of Terminators.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but what kind of range do you get with tiny drones? Although they could probably be delivered to the vicinity by some other vessel. Like cluster warheads but with a large swarm of exploding autonomous drones.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Quite a bit more than you would think. Remember, besides the potential for a drone carrier, these drones wouldn't need power for the flight back.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

A non-rechargable battery can also have significantly more capacity. A suicide drone likely doesn't need to be recharged.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I've already watched dozens of Russians die like this.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 9 months ago

Hoping it will be treated like biological chemical warfare. It may be good at killing, but that's not necessarily the best way of conducting warfare