this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
38 points (93.2% liked)

Games

16785 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
38
Helldivers 2 CEO talks DLSS and FSR: 'When you are in a prio meeting and it's more awesome content vs more tech the decision is easy…' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 8 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think preferring a lower-than-native resolution over DLSS as a blanket statement is a bit of a wild take, but there can definitely be problems like artifacts, especially in certain games. I'm playing RDR2 at the moment and the TAA (which is forced to High with DLSS) is poorly implemented and causes flickers which is definitely annoying, as an example. I played Alan Wake 2 on an older laptop that barely ran it and I definitely noticed artifacting from DLSS there, though in fairness I was demanding a lot from that machine by forcing it to play AW2.

Frame time will of course be impacted so if you're playing something really fast and twitchy you should stay away from DLSS probably. It's also less bad if you don't enable Frame Generation. Finally, both DLSS and Frame Generation input lag seems to scale with your baseline FPS. Using it to try to reach 60+ FPS will usually mean some input lag, using it when you're already at ~60 FPS to get 80-100 or whatever means less noticeable input lag.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Finally, both DLSS and Frame Generation input lag seems to scale with your baseline FPS. Using it to try to reach 60+ FPS will usually mean some input lag, using it when you’re already at ~60 FPS to get 80-100 or whatever means less noticeable input lag.

In most cases DLSS actually reduces your input lag because you're getting a higher framerate. Not sure what you're talking about.

https://youtu.be/osLDDl3HLQQ?t=219

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Might be just frame generation I was thinking of.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah frame generation is crap, I wouldn't ever use it.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think frame generation is crap outright, it's still free frames, it's just only really useful when you're already at a solid frame rate.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 8 months ago

It's not really free frames though. It's no different to motion interpolation on TVs that makes everything look soap opera-like. The game is still playing at the lower framerate, and the disconnect between your input running at one framerate but what you're seeing looking like it's running at another is going to feel "off".