this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
394 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 137 points 8 months ago (8 children)

There's only one country who has been running around doing this the past two decades. They've been confirmed to be in these areas, AND they have the capability.

Ladies and Gentlemen...RUSSIA!

You sad ass pieces of shit.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 52 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be honest I'd be surprised if this was Russia. It's certainly not outside of Russia's capabilities, but at the end of the day they're just cables. Plenty of the Red Sea is right next to Houthi-controlled territory and not all that deep. Something like this is commercially available and easily capable of reaching the floor of the area near the Bab el-Mandeb that any cables from Europe to East Asia have to go through

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago

I mean depending on how deep they are they wouldn't even really need that. I imagine you could just drop an anchor and drag it.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And the Vietnamese internet sharks.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

DEFINITELY A SHARK IN THAT PICTURE

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Can't you just drop a small anchor (on a decently large ship) and drag it along the sea floor? This type of attack doesn't submarines.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, in fact, that's what happened last time the whole Arab peninsula was knocked off the Internet.

[–] denast@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is there additional reading I can do on the topic? I've googled but found nothing but concerns from Nato officials that Russia could engage in seabed sabotage. This comment is universally praised so I guess it's some universal knowledge I missed. What are some instances when they did it?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Near the beginning of the Ukraine War, someone damaged an underwater pipeline. It was from Russia but Russia couldn’t use it because of sanctions. I don’t recall any one figuring out who it was, so everyone blamed Russia, except those blaming Ukraine , or somehow there was a reason for US

[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

I thought it was Egypt?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You mean, like that time they blew up their own pipeline? Oh wait....

[–] Nobilmantis@feddit.it 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah right? Wasn't it ukranians that did that?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah, but for like a full year the US, the EU, and the press blamed Russia. Even though it's obvious they knew full well who did it. Let alone that this explanation made no sense at all anyway.

Source for those who downvoted this: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would Russian government need to do this kind of thing? You should separate their PR part (which is destructive and incompetent) and things actually done.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why would they do 90% of the idiotic shit they do?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One can imagine lots of reasons, confidently name none, which probably is the goal.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

First lie wins then after that the most interesting one

So if you do something wrong say you did something else worse and make every spend their time fighting that first story