this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
192 points (77.1% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Up to 30% of Apple Vision Pro Returns Are Because Users Don't Get It, Analyst Says::While Vision Pro returns were uncommon, many came down to owners not figuring out its spatial computing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 259 points 8 months ago (4 children)

1% of the headsets are returned. 30% of those returns (0.3% of the overall headsets) are because the user couldn’t figure it out.

This is clickbait.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (2 children)

To save me reading what is surely a terrible article, what aren't people getting?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Frankly, if just 0.3% of buyers return an IT product (especially a novel one) because they "don't get it", that's a massive success in my book. Have you seen users?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

I work in IT so the answer is “too many” lol

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Returns are very low. If the tittle talks only about a PERCENTAGE OF that low number, while that percentage being a high number, it is easily confused. Confusion is the goal of the modern journalMARKETINGist

Edit: I will not remove or replace the word tittle. I like it.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

Wow, from all the stories of people returning them for all kinds of reasons, I thought the number of returns was way higher.
That's actually a decent piece of information for the article to include IMO.

[–] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good point. But also fuck apple and all the capilistic consumption thriving on over seas suffering.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

- posted from a non-Apple device (which was also made with over seas suffering)

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Not if it is a Fairphone, and probably also some other devices.

[–] Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Clent@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Following the links it's 20%-30% -- it's about 360-540 users if there were 180,000 sold as the analyst predicted.

I would bet some percentage of those only chose that option because they didn't want to admit they bought it with the intent to return it but it's pointless to speculate without knowing how this compares with other similar product launches.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Right. There were a bunch of streamers advocating just that: free use for a couple weeks, then return. Is suppose it makes more sense if you were a soulless, self-serving streamer, that wants to make a video while cheating the cost