this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
705 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
705
HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors (arstechnica.com)
submitted 8 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
169 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors::"Never own a printer again."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I will refuse to buy anything HP, even used stuff, purely out of spite for them pulling this shit.

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Im at peace knowing that i bought it off the previous owner and not from the company, but that is completely fair.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Okay, I might make an exception for antique tech from the '90s or earlier, back when HP was actually good (e.g. a LaserJet 4, an HP-28C calculator, the function generator somebody posted in another thread yesterday, etc.). That's very unlikely, though.

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Their OfficeJet Pro is $13 a month and offers next business day replacement. If I were to purchase out of spite, it would be with a debit/temporary card with exactly $13 on it, and claim a replacement for defective printer (since it cant print offline). I wonder if HP would still try these things if each “customer” costed them substantially more in shipping back and forth, or having to write off two “office” printers for $13.