Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

236

Windows 11 now supports USB4 at 80Gbps, also known as USB 4 2.0 | Faster USB4 devices could start appearing in 2024 (www.techspot.com)

submitted 8 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Windows 11 now supports USB4 at 80Gbps, also known as USB 4 2.0 | Faster USB4 devices could start appearing in 2024::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gashead76@lemmy.world 138 points 8 months ago (6 children)

“USB 4 2.0”… someone should really do something about the incredibly goofy naming scheme.

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 68 points 8 months ago (2 children)

With a version number like that they should have throttled the throughput to 69 Gbps.

[–] gashead76@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Oh damn, I didn’t even catch that!

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

1985Mbps/1.21GW

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 24 points 8 months ago

Someone was high.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I never bothered to check, but are there multiple organizations making different names? Or just one that has no consistency whatsoever

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They name by committee. So every corporation that is in the USB standards group will argue for whatever benefits them, with no consideration for consumers.

I fucking hate it. Buy a USB C cable and it's a crapshoot whether it's USB 2 with no power delivery, or poor quality with power delivery. Just trying to find a good quality USB 3 cable is difficult, with 3.1 or 3.2, x2 or not, shitty control chips, etc etc.

[–] gashead76@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It is absolutely infuriating. It blows my mind that you can have a USB 3.2 Gen2 cable that does everything you need it to, except for the fact that it doesn’t support Power Delivery and a lot of the time you won’t even know, so if you’re sending high wattage through it there’s a real possibility you’re gonna burn some to kind up.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

In theory, compliant devices can detect the voltage drop over shitty cables and request a lower charging rate.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 0 points 8 months ago

if you’re sending high wattage through it there’s a real possibility you’re gonna burn some to kind up.

Anything over 3A or 60W requires the cable to have an e-marker. A little chip inside one of the connectors that indicates what the cable is capable of. No USB certified device should try to pull 60W or more through a cable without e-marker or anything above what the cable can handle if it does have a marker.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So universal

[–] gashead76@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

I know, it is a never ending source of minor comedy that “Universal” is right there in the name.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Dammit elon. The 420 ‘jokes’ aren’t as funny as you think they are. /s.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

It's like they just throw darts and see what hits