this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
83 points (95.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
419 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I hear people say that about Nextcloud often, which is part of why I haven't bothered setting it up yet.

Is there a technical reason why it's slow and clunky? Any problematic choices with how it was built?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cron@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the file server analogy isn't really fair. Nextcloud is better compared to Microsoft 365 or Google GSuite.

All of these offer file storage, but also much more.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sure. But serving files is the core functionality of Nextcloud. You can remove every other functionality. But the files app cannot be removed.

[–] owen@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

I agree. They're suffering from feature creep I fear

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 8 months ago

I disagree. The extras and modularity are the core functionality. If you're just serving files, there's SFTP, WebDAV, etc.