this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
132 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Software can detect the hardware it's being run on. I imagine that massive amounts of targeted clicks and views detected from x86, or emulated Android, would trigger fraud alerts.

Additionally, phones are cheap and use a lot less power then the x86 cluster required to replicate that many "individual" users/devices.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

On top of that, they pay these people so little that it's cheaper to hire 50 of them for a year than to hire one person to run an operation like that for the same time.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago

You can always spoof what software sees, but I guess this hackery development of spoofing tools would be more expensive than doing it on physical phones.