this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
152 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

According to a recent tweet shared by AI enthusiast Nick St. Pierre, the alleged theft occurred last Saturday. It is claimed that employees from Stability AI infiltrated Midjourney's database and stole all prompt and image pairs, an action that also caused a 24-hour outage. In response, MJ reportedly banned all Stable Diffusion developers from its services, a move supposedly disclosed internally within the company on Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only if your prompts are boring and dull. The more details I add to my prompts, the more unique of a look I can achieve.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, some people don't notice the creative void in AI because they are themselves hollow humunculuses. They crawl at the edge of the human fire of creation and gather stray embers that hit the dead sands they occupy. Once in a while they find an ember with some faded glow left and they hold it up and say "The more details I add to my prompts, the more unique of a look I can achieve."

I pity them because they will never understand true warmth.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Agree and disagree. You actually can get proper art out of those systems, also novelty, but it usually involves leading the AI onto a gradient you can't reach with mere text prompts. It's kinda like with riding horses: As a beginner, the horse will judge you an idiot and follow the horse in front of it and not your commands. You have to have both the intention and the skill to lead the horse onto an untrodden path.

Or, differently put: If a sketch can be art then so can a piece that the AI generated from it, one that was declared adequate by the sketch maker. "Here, machine", said the human, "I have done my part, I have infused these bits with life, now you do the boring stuff and polish it".

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't know what part of my answer full of contempt made you think that I am open to the standard tech bro babble?

I think you are disgusting people and charlatans desperately trying to pretend that you know what art is. Is that a clearer response for you. The first response was a bit too creative so I understand why you wouldn't understand it.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I understood you just fine. What you don't seem to understand is that art depends not on the medium but the creator. Where do you draw the line? If I throw a sculpt of mine not into SDXL but Cycles to render, does it suddenly become art? Or is it still not art because I'm not using a paintbrush, hell I'm not doing a single bit of shading? Do I need to work with actual clay? That clay also has an undo button (of sorts). Does only marble count? What's your standard? Can you articulate it?

The vast bulk of AI pictures out there are bland and uninspired because it's not artists who hit the generate button. It's as simple as that. There's also plenty of bland and uninspired oil on canvas out there -- not as large a proportion because the craft is not easy to pick up while staying completely artistically illiterate, but it's still there because artistic expression is not the only reason why people paint. And that's fine. And so is randos typing "big tiddies" into a prompt box and hitting generate. Noone claims that's art, but at the utmost that it looks nice.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You are in no way different from the people typing "big tiddies" into a prompt box and hitting generate. You only sound slightly more intelligent to the other cold husks but to us standing by the bonfire, you look exactly the same. I actually respect the titty people more because they know what they are and dont pretend to care.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Got you. You can't articulate it.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I did articulate it. It is not my fault that inhuman ghouls cant understand the point.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You articulated a judgement. You did not articulate a distinction.

Also your insults aren't even creative: There's pathos there, yes, but it's derivative. Mere intensity does not art make.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Get well soon, then.