this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
646 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Back then Chrome didn't exist and they didn't implement the pop up, just assigned some overview and opened some APIs.

However, the DOJ did not require Microsoft to change any of its code nor did it prevent Microsoft from tying other software with Windows in the future.

The popup came in 2009.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seems to me they continued to take actions in 2009 as a result of their loss in 2001. "Some overview" continued after the case was decided. Unless there was a subsequent court case I'm unaware of?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The 2009 dispute was in the EU, to begin with.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The didn't cause the browser popup then

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why did I bring up a regulation that the EU imposed on Microsoft, in the comments of an article about regulations that the EU wants to impose on tech giants?

You're right, totally out of context.