this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
192 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If I buy an EV I would like it to do 400 miles, but I don't need 0-60 in 3 seconds.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Low 0-60 times are inherent to EVs. There's no transmission and the motor has a wide efficiency area. It's basically hard to make a non dual motor EV accelerate slowly. Single motor ones aren't quick, but you won't get AWD if that's a thing you desire.

[–] Oderus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's easy to make a less powerful motor. As someone else said, the current market is for people who are looking for better performance and aren't concerned with price. I put a deposit on a Polestar 3 that does 0-60 in 4.7s which is slow compared to its competition like the Model X and BMW iX but I don't care about 0-60. It's a meaningless metric to judge a car by. My Challenger SRT 392 does the 0-60 in 4.2s but I bought that car for how nice it looks, not its 0-60.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think trim packages or settings in the car that trade acceleration for range make a lot of sense.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's not really how electric motors work though. They spin up crazy fast, which means fast 0-60 times. Think about an electric mixer in your kitchen; it takes more or less the the same amount of time for it get up to speed weather it's on the highest setting or the lowest setting since the motor is the only moving part. There is no fancy gearing to vary the speeds, it's based solely on the amount of energy being put into the system.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and varying the amount of power put into the system would increase or decrease the total range. A full power launch depletes the battery more quickly than a gentle, controlled acceleration to road speed.

I'm talking about limiting the amount of power that can be dumped into the motor at any given time, or limiting the power of the motor itself in order to get a more efficient experience.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago

That's entirely on the user at that point, and cant really be designed around. Anything you add to limit acceleration is just going to add more complexity and expense for no actual benefit. If you want better range, stop flooring the car out of every stop, same as an ICE car.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago

Ye canna change the laws of physics! Acceleration is proportional to force exerted (F=ma) and has nothing to do with the amount of energy stored, which gives you range. You might get a few percent efficiency bonus from lesser acceleration due to losses (so 2-3 extra Km per 100), but you can't "trade acceleration for range"