this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
558 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] laxe@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (1 children)

All Musk companies are sweatshops.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To think that amount of wealth can be earned is fucking naive. More than naive. More than how a child is naive. It's willful ignorance, full stop, and if you are for it, you're the enemy of the people.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is only true as an "Achilles and tortoise" argument. I agree it can't be 100% fairly earned, but then nothing can.

Can it be 80% fairly earned? 60%?

It’s willful ignorance, full stop, and if you are for it, you’re the enemy of the people.

If somebody declares part of the people enemies of the people, then they are enemies of the people themselves.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a good question actually, the first one at least. I'd be fine with 80% of it being earned if someone did 80% of the work. I know life is a bit more nuanced than that, but people are smart and it is achievable, or at least close to the idea.

The second part though is not logical and I really don't think I need to explain why, but I am willing to.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago

The second part though is not logical and I really don’t think I need to explain why, but I am willing to.

When you make the concept of "enemy of the people" acceptable, first people to use it are those with most power.