this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
102 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40313 readers
185 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Keeping tradition with doing things backwards, I've finally got a UPS for the rack (mounted in the bottom of the stack). Got a PowerWalker VI 2200R. Its a 2U unit which is all the space I've got left in the rack. Decent price and decent I/O with USB, serial and a slot-in for network expansion + 4 IEC outputs. Its powering everything in the rack and connected via USB to my main server which runs a NUT server that other machines can connect to. A calibration run (100-80%) puts the runtime at about 20 min. Long enough that I'm comfortable setting things to shut down when 20% capacity remains. Summary, I sleep better now.

The rack with the UPS at the bottom

NUT output

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Back when I built racks, our "standard" was UPS at the bottom, all drives at the top...but mainly for accessibility. Hadn't even thought about vibrations or interference!

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ups at the bottom is also because of the weight of the batteries. In a small rack like this I don't think moving the disks 30cm up will make a big difference.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Absolutely on that point. Same goes for heavy multi zone amplifiers.

Man I loved building racks. Almost makes me miss field work...

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Drives at the top? Hell no. SANs are heavy, they go in the bottom half too (assuming a mixed rack). Especially if you have those disk shelves that slide out so they hold 3.5" drives three deep. Top of the rack is for network hardware and such.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I did not install SANs, I built racks for AV so the only drives were NAS/mini PCs on shelves