this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
80 points (74.1% liked)

Memes

51698 readers
1956 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Giving full economic power to the state does not make you less fascist. It actually makes it much worse.

Just a reminder to the true leftists who think they can force through their better society by giving society more power over the individual without changing the culture in the first place.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That’s not what fascist means. Fascism is specific a right wing ideology, because it involves close cooperation between the government and capitalist monopolies. Mussolini praised “capitalist production, captains of industries, modern entrepreneurs”. You seem to mean authoritarian.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I understand the definition of fascism. You are missing the portion by which corporations are not allowed to exist if they do not further the efforts of the state. Basically exactly the same as Marx advised towards the end of his writings. Nothing is allowed to exist in a socialist system if it is perceived to work against the needs of the people (state)

There is functionally no difference between corporations that do not control the means of production even if they are charged with running it and a state fully owning the means. It's just middle management.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

A socialist system doesn't have to be state-based. Socialism can encompass anarchism, anarcho-communism and many other left ideologies besides state-communism.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay, but that doesn't make a leftist system fascist. That's what authoritarian means in an economic sense. There are many other aspects of fascism.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If there is functionally no difference between the systems, it it's fascism. Call a duck a duck. Oppressed people don't care that the flag is red.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fascism includes various types of oppression not present in other ideologies, such as sexism and manipulation/fear about minority groups as 'the enemy'.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That is a result of the perception that those groups work against the state, not a requirement for fascism. Communist systems have just as bad if not worse a track record in regards to minority oppression as fascist ones.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just a reminder, abolishing the state is cool.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I am sure that will protect minorities! That's definitely never resulted in genocide. It'll be fine this time around.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

For context: OP is on lemmy.world which blocks the tankie instances if I'm not mistaken. So they seem to refer to based leftist stuff I assume and isn't a redfash.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The true marxist based left is not woke. It never was. There's a reason that the western left turned liberal in the 50s and 60s and focused on reform. The CCP killed any thought that decentralized communes could be self-sufficient and centralization killed any concept of liberalism and a responsive command economy. If the majority can vote their way into resources, minorities suffer. With no opposition checking the ruling party, corruption sets in.

If you are referring to the American Democratic party, they are liberal and not left.