this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
22 points (89.3% liked)

Games

16800 readers
673 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Pretty brave releasing DLC for the game in it's current state.

[–] JoMomma@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Didn't they claim they would fix issues before adding DLC? Or am I thinking of KSP2... or Star field... Or....

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

They've fixed a shit ton of issues

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

To be fair, Starfield has had a lot of major patches with very long changelogs released before its first DLC comes out, which is still not released and has no release date except "2024."

No idea about Cities or KSP2 though.

[–] MarcomachtKuchen@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to dismiss all the valid criticisms but those poeple working on asset packs are not the same that would be fixing technical errors. Also the announcement includes a mayor performance patch (well see how that goes) and the beginnings of nodding tools. It propably won't fix everything that's currently wrong but if like to be proven wrong

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah idk with how angry the fans have been I don't think there's anything they can do that will make the angry people happy, so they might as well do what they feel is best.

They release fixes but no DLC: Great, so we can play a game and it doesn't even have modding/dlc support , 6 months too late

They release DLC but fixes aren't ready: Great so they aren't prioritizing fixes

Lose/lose for them.

I also don't think they plan on "fixing" stuff like fans expect. They released this to be a ten-year game. I'll get downvoted to hell, but they built this to run at 30fps, if they can hit that bar now then I think they're good. I think too many people are looking at CS:1 through the lens of 10-years of development, with the mods, dlcs, and packs we all love, and forget what it was like when it started - which was remarkably close to this one. It was absolutely fun, but definitely a bit clunky and empty, but it was right off the heels of SimCity 2013 and everyone was desperate for anything better than that, so the bar was at the bottom. To me this feels exactly the same as the original release. It got better over time, and as hardware improved so did the game. But hey, what do I know, I'm just a pleb from the 90s who's happy playing simulator games at 30fps.

[–] apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah in the short term there are going to be a lot of lose/lose scenarios for them, but this is the stupid prize for playing stupid games with what they released.

I hope they stock it out, games like No Man's Sky show both that a developer who cares enough to try can earn back the trust of a player base, and that the process to do so requires a lot of work.