this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
73 points (84.8% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (3 children)

In response to the DOJ’s assertion, Apple confirmed for the first time that it at one point considered Android support for the Apple Watch. After a three-year investigation, Apple says that it determined an Apple Watch with Android support wasn’t doable because of technical limitations. As such, it scrapped the idea.

Yeah, bullshit.

Somehow Garmin, Samsung, HTC, Huawei, Pebble (RIP), Fossil, Moto/Lenovo, etc. managed to do it just fine.

Rather than technical reasons, rather I suspect the real reasons were financial and ideological, i.e. it would would conflict with Apple's brand-wide pathos of vendor lock-in, and would mean the maximum amount of capital would not extracted from the rubes as a portion of it might -- shock, horror -- go to one of their competitors, Google or Samsung.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 33 points 8 months ago

Apple spending 3 years researching and determining it is not doable due to technical limitations:
We've tried nothing and we are all out of ideas.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Which is exactly why they are getting sued, for creating vendor lock-in and monopoly.