In the months since I deleted my Reddit accounts and joined Lemmy, the lack of user base growth has made it clear that we need some users to stay on Reddit as a means of shepherding more users over on an ongoing basis. Otherwise, Reddit simply got what it wanted: less users who make a fuss about how it manages its platform without losing users en-masse.

In doing so, however, does Reddit shadowban posts that mention or promote Lemmy? Googling mentions of Lemmy on Reddit mostly brings up posts from around the time of the blackout, suggesting that mentions of it since then have been suppressed. Before I return to Reddit to promote Lemmy, does anyone know for certain one way or the other?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ghostrider2112@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

When I ended up at Reddit 16 years ago after Digg, I don’t recall it being a huge community immediately. I think it helped that there weren’t subreddits yet. So, probably seemed like more people. I think it took a couple of years for the transition to hit critical mass.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Yup, this is the answer. We know enshittification will continue apace because history has shown that these companies will never change their behaviour. They are fundamentally fragile systems.

The way to deal with this is not some big marketing push - that's a centralised approach - but to make an antifragile system that will slowly gain users and not lose them en masse. It's the tortoise vs the hare.

Lemmy is the tortoise.

I'm not even too worried about corporate entryism - although I do think we should block them - because they will only make fragile instances and they will be outlasted as long as we keep independent instances alive and healthy.

[–] chrishazfun@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's how I see Threads at the moment, an opportunity for on-ramping to better platforms is better than nothing. The problem is hoping Meta doesn't compromise on the transition function if a user wants to leave.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

The one thing we can certainly count on META doing is screwing their users over if they think it might make them money.

[–] ghostrider2112@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Precisely. Excellent points!

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It would be really slick if you could join multiple communities into a larger virtual one kinda like multi-reddits. It would be a nice way to aggregate similar communities from different instances and not segment the limited userbase too much. I tend to rely on my main feed here more for similar reasons

[–] thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A couple of the apps do have this "multi community" feature, if you're a mobile user. Summit definitely does, Raccoon (the one I'm replying from now) technically does but it's pretty broken so I'm hoping that gets looked at soon. And tbh maybe more of them do now, it's been a while since I checked!

[–] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 1 points 7 months ago

If the back end provided support for multi-communities it would work cross-app in the same way... unfortunately it looks like this is not a priority for the time being.

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Mbin has that