Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

436

Twelve years after the death of Steve Jobs, the cracks are starting to appear at Apple (www.notebookcheck.net)

submitted 8 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

188 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] simple@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (4 children)

So you think they should just make no money because you're mildly inconvenienced?

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No. If you make money from ads your clients are the adversers and your readers are an asset you seek to capitalize. That is in opposition to journalistic integrity.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And the servers run from exposure?

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

no, they don't. you (the reader) have to pay for them - if you want to be the client, that is. otherwise you are the goods that is being sold.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

somehow I doubt most people on here including you pay for online newsletters.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

i do care a lot about your doubts. do you have more of them? 🤣

[–] RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I’m not saying they aren’t allowed to show ads, but I am saying that once they do, they are no longer allowed to refer to themselves as independent.

No company that wants to advertise on your website is stupid enough to sign away editorial control, i.e. once you agree to display their ads, you are no longer allowed to say anything bad about them. And even if they did, there’s still the looming risk that if you do, they are well within their rights to pull their ads and there goes your income.

If you’re going to show ads, be honest to your readers about what that means.

[–] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

In opposition to popular sentiment, good journalism actually does make money. It just doesn't make as much money. And bad journalism without advertising makes no money.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I think corporations should be crushed so they are small enough to drown in a dirty used toilet.