this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
634 points (98.0% liked)

Greentext

4430 readers
908 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is why we donate blood.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This would be a powerful Red Cross ad.

Lower your microplastics count. Donate blood so you can make more.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if they actually filter the blood that people donate. I know they test it, but it would be cool if they filtered it as well for various crap.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Could they even filter microplastics without just getting rid of all of the red blood cells? If they were big enough to be filtered without catching blood cells we would probably be seeing way more people getting actively and catasteophically screwed by them.

Here's one source about the size of microplastics:

The researchers couldn't give a precise breakdown of the particle sizes due to the limitations of the testing methods. It's safe to presume, however, that smaller particles closer to the 700 nanometer limit of the analysis would be easier for the body to take in than larger particles exceeding 100 micrometers.

And red blood cells are 6.2–8.2μm. So I wonder if some kind of sieve could filter anything smaller than 5μm or so. Then again, there's probably a bunch of other stuff in there as well, like white blood cells.

It's too bad that they're in the same range as important things...