this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1211 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Is this actually good news? What can a single state do? Shouldn't this be federal?

[–] Shir0a@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Special exceptions are hard to deal with when you're mass producing. That's why a fair amount of the rulings made by the European Union also end up applying to North America when it comes to international businesses.

It basically means someone like Apple has to decide between not selling in Oregon at all, making special phones for Oregon, or making all of their phones not have paired parts. It's a pretty big thorn in their side, and it would only take a few more states to join in before they really have to start committing to a solution.

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My guess: they'll go the lawsuit route.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If Apple's approach in the EU is anything to go by, they'll disable repaired phones if they're taken outside Oregon.

[–] Shir0a@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Ooh that would be a bastard approach to it wouldn't it? You've nearly convinced me that's totally what's gonna happen now.

[–] Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 7 months ago

A single state is still a large market to pass up, and tooling costs make it impractical to manufacture different versions of things.

Even for software, the US experiences positive externalities of the GDPR and the rest of the US does from privacy laws in California and Illinois (likely others that I don't know off the top of my head)

State laws also often serve as the prototype for federal ones.

It should be federal, but this is absolutely good news.

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

what kind of logic is that? A small victory is better than no victory

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

They can ban selling products which do it