this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
520 points (99.1% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
636 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago (6 children)

t y for sharing.

#showerthoughts The problem is in upstream and has only entered Debian Sid/unstable. Does this mean that for example bleeding edge Arch (btw) sshd users are compromised already ?

[–] Dima@lemmy.one 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Looks like the 5.6.1-2 release on Arch moved from using the published GitHub releases to just using the git repository directly, which as I understand avoids the exploit (because the obfuscated script to inject the exploit is only present in the packaged tarballs and not the git repo itself)

https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/xz/-/commit/881385757abdc39d3cfea1c3e34ec09f637424ad

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They also believe we (Arch users) are unaffected because this backdoor targeted Debian and Redhat type packaging specifically and also relied on a certain SSH configuration Arch doesn't use. To be honest while it's nice to know we're unaffected, it's not at all comforting that had the exploiter targeted Arch they would have succeeded. Just yesterday I was talking to someone about how much I love rolling release distros and now I'm feeling insecure about it.

More details here: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/xz/-/issues/2

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Someone always has to be the guinea pig.

That being said, maybe there's an argument for distros that do rolling releases to have an "intentionally delayed rolling release" that just trails the regular rolling release by a fixed amount of time to provide more time for guinea pigs to run into things. If you want rolling, but can live with the delay, just use that.

[–] Gobbel2000@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago

OpenSuse Slowroll does pretty much that, a slightly delayed rolling release.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Arch is on 5.6.1 as of now: https://archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/xz/

We at Nixpkgs have barely evaded having it go to a channel used by users and we don't seem to be affected by the backdoor.

[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Arch had a patch rolled out yesterday [1][2][3] that switches to the git repo. On top of that the logic in the runtime shim and build script modifier was orchestrated to target Debian and RPM build systems and environments [4].

[1] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/xz/-/commit/881385757abdc39d3cfea1c3e34ec09f637424ad

[2] https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/xz/-/issues/2

[3] https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2024-3094

[4] https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/29/4

[–] blaise@champserver.net 11 points 7 months ago

The link mentions that it is only ran as part of a debian or RPM package build. Not to mention that on Arch sshd is not linked against liblzma anyways.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Thanks a bunch.

[–] LastoftheDinosaurs@reddthat.com 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It was also on Gentoo. I had this version installed for a day or two.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Since you didn't build a RPM or DEB package however, your didn't compile in the backdoor.

[–] LastoftheDinosaurs@reddthat.com 4 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it's probably fine. I also don't use systemd. I was just pointing out that another rolling release distribution had the affected version.

[–] SMillerNL@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Homebrew rolled back the release after finding out

[–] cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Here's a link to the PR for anyone who's interested