this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
1200 points (97.7% liked)

Greentext

4437 readers
874 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No.250341473
>fantasy setting has magic and flying creatures
>still using horses as main transportation

No.250341651
>>250341473 (OP) #
>setting has nuclear energy
>still using coal as main energy source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Someone's never owned a boat.

There are 3 idioms that come to mind.

A boat is a hole in the water you pour money into.

A boat owner is only happy twice. When they buy a boat, and when they sell it.

"You don't want to buy a boat. What you want is a friend with a boat!"

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 7 months ago

A boat for personal use and a boat for trade use are two very different things.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For trading, boats have always been better in regards to the amount of stuff you can carry, even back before sails were invented. Also, unlike roads, water doesn't need maintenance, it just needs to be at a high enough level that the boat won't crash into rocks or whatever.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

My main point was that boats aren't free to run. They require constant maintenance and care to remain viable. If you're going to include the maintenance and running costs of a horse team, then you need to also include the equivalent for boats.

Don't get me wrong, when you have a waterway, boats still win, by a large margin. Hence why Europe has so many canals etc.