Technology

59589 readers

3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1241

Enshittification Continues: Discord to begin showing advertisements on it's free platform (archive.is)

submitted 7 months ago by empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

388 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They supposedly can be disabled in settings- but we all know that won't last. They're going full Microsoft Skype mode and it's only a matter of time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Enshittification isn't illegal though. And making it illegal sounds pretty draconian and anti liberal to me.

I, for one, will never pay for discord, and if the communities I do use it for decide to move elsewhere, I'll happily move over.

[–] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Yeah that's true, and I agree trying to regulate enshittification out of existence will probably have some heavy handed implications. However I do think it's worth rethinking how network effects as extreme as Discord implements them relate to monopoly.

[–] patatahooligan@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely not "draconian" to make enshittification illegal. But you don't regulate the turning-to-shit part. You regulate the part where they offer a service for free or too cheap so that they kill the competition. This is called anti-competitive and we supposedly address it already. You also regulate what an EULA can enforce and the ability of companies to change the EULA after a user has agreed to it. Again, these concepts already exist in law.

We've essentially already identified these problems and we have decided that we need to address them, but we been ineffective in doing so for various reasons.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 3 points 7 months ago

But you don't regulate the turning-to-shit part.

Yups, that's what I was getting at. There can be very good reasons to do things that are impopular with end users.

At the same time, without reddit turning to shit, Lemmy wouldn't have thrived the way it is now. Change is part of life, as is platforms turning to shit. You move over and learn to deal with it. You might be able to nudge it in the right direction, but in the end, corporations gonna corporate.