this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
61 points (98.4% liked)

Games

16785 readers
847 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
61
Hellblade 2 will be 30fps only on Xbox consoles (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 7 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/11204474

Hellblade 2 will be 30fps only on Xbox consoles

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Just because Hellblade 2 runs at 30 FPS, it doesn't mean it's optimized worse than Metal Gear Solid 2. There's way more being processed per second in order to render Senua than there is to render Raiden, and it's a trade-off that the developers decided was worth it, even if you and I disagree. That still doesn't mean it's poorly optimized.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Generally agree but there's a good chance it is less optimized than MGS2 because that game pushed the hardware to its limits

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Image

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If you can't understand why some games can run at 60 and others can't, then I can't help you.

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I completely understand it. Publishers want pretty graphics at all cost and give 0 time for developers to optimize it

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you think Hellblade II could run on a NES, given infinite development time to optimize it?

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No clearly not but we're talked about the latest console from Microsoft. Not saying it's insanely powerful but it sure as shit ain't weak or outdated hardware

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Then you can acknowledge that there are limits to what video games can run on a given set of hardware, regardless of optimization. There's been diminishing returns in graphics processing since the beginning of time. In order to get to that next step of realism, it's going to cost more than it took the last time we saw a similar leap.