this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
259 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

But can it be solved by throwing less sensors at the problem? Cause that's what he's been doing. Removing sensors from the newer versions that were in the older ones.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Drop the cameras, add lidar instead. That's true 3d vision, which no amount of cameras can replace.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But people drive with just eyes, why can't cars drive with just eyes? Someone in Tesla accountint probably...

[–] G0ldenSp00n@lemmy.jacaranda.club 4 points 7 months ago

Elon has literally said exactly this so many times. I think it is probably possible to make a car drive with just vision, but you make the task monumentally harder by not having things that ground you in reality, ie. lidar.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 1 points 7 months ago

Someone told them the problem was just "too many variables", so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.