this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
181 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stretch2m@lemm.ee 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I disagree about the purpose of email. I end most meetings thinking to myself, "That last hour could have been accomplished in a brief email."

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think you're both right. A lot of meetings are one person talking and the others listening, that could have been an email. Actual back-and-forth discussion needs to be verbal though, otherwise what could be resolved in 10 minutes takes a week.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Exactly.

Email doesn't get buy-in from stakeholders as well, either. It's also a lot harder to flesh out subletities and nuance in whatever problem you're addressing.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago

Meetings are a different problem.

If meetings are used merely to disseminate info from above, then it should be an email.

Email shouldn't be used for decision-making conversations. It doesn't work well.

(I didn't come up with this, it was taught to me by senior management at one company that had the most impressive communications I've ever seen).