this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
179 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Step one... create consent deepfake....

I don't like that I thought it... But It pains me to say it will be used as a defense at some point.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh wow... You could use a consent deep fake to trick another person to create the sex one. This gets messy quick...

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Plausible deniability is a helluva thing.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You're not the first to think of it and it's where this whole idea will fall flat on it's face.

There's just no way to actually check if the subject of a photo consented to having their photo taken. That was difficult enough with physical cameras, it's so much more difficult now that no camera is involved in generating the image.

I mean, if I were to post an image here in this comment - how can the Fediverse possibly verify that I have the right to post it?

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I just imagine someone showing up to my work and presenting that contract and next thing you know I'm stuck in the dryer with only my stepson Esteban to help me...