this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
767 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

4452 readers
506 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThoGot@lemm.ee 82 points 7 months ago (53 children)

To be fair, brutalist buildings are fugly

[–] huginn@feddit.it 59 points 7 months ago (25 children)

To you.

The peak of brutality architecture beats any other type in my eyes. It's beautiful in a way no other building or style compares.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago (18 children)

Unfortunately many brutalistic buildings are far off from its peak and just look like lazily designed gray blobs. High-effort brutalism can look good (or can look inappropriately evil but that's besides the point); low-effort brutalism always looks cheap.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cheap brutalism can look good.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can you share examples of good and bad brutality buildings that are cheap? I'm just curious what you like

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes but I'm currently traveling and have very limited Internet access... I'll try and remember to do this in a couple weeks when I'm back into good connectivity.

Plus being home will let me pull out my Big Book of Brutalism to reference.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

No sweat, I was jw

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For good brutalised, look at the Barbican or Habitat 67

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That habitat 67 building is crazy looking!

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)