DogWater

joined 11 months ago
[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I agree, but off grid solar requires a lot more panels and personal infrastructure owned by the customer than grid tied solar. and a storage solution for night time and winter and cloudy days.

A typical house isn't going off grid and maintaining a worry free electric schedule without a minimum of 25,000$ of panels, mounts, inverters, batteries, BMS, cabling, installation, and permits.

To be fair, the cost is still less than the amount of time the system will last so economically is can be viable but who has 25,000$ just sitting around...you have to be able to install it yourself to save enough money to really even think about doing it.

I am on your side, but we should be focusing on storage technology right now because solar is honestly really advanced at this point. Once those technologies can work together all the arguments against solar that make sense disappear.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Because grid level power delivery is about FAR more than just raw wattage numbers. Momentum of spinning turbines is extremely important to the grid. The grid relies on generation equipment maintaing an AC frequency of 60 hz or 50hz or whatever a country decides on. Changing loads throughout the day literally add an amount of drag to the entire grid and it can drag the frequency down. The inverse can also happen. If you have fluctuating wind or cloud cover you can bring the whole grid down if you can't instantly spin up other methods to pick up the slack.

reliable consistent power delivery is absolutely critical when it comes to running the grid effectively and that is something that solar and wind are bad at

Ideally we will be able to use those technologies to fill grid level storage (batteries, pumped hydro) to supply 100% of our energy needs in the not too distant future but until then we desperately need large, consistent, clean power generation.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

This is genuinely hilarious to see the advice to wear some cologne getting down voted lmao

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You're ignoring the point of why it's useful and at this point, necessary, to have an above average understanding of technology to maintain any semblance of privacy in your life....you can do so much harm to yourself without ever knowing it just by having an Alexa or by having a Tesla.

At certain point it's like what the fuck can we even do with things specifically like the tool this article is talking about but tech illiteracy isn't excusable if this day and age anymore. The world demands a certain level of knowledge or you can and will be exploited.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Indeed. Hello poorish brother

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Waco intensifies

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I feel the same way man, I'm so excited about this tech because of the few use cases that we will discover and will change our lives and cause a paradigm shift...but it will be controlled by someone who is ultra rich (a person or corp) so that's awful. And there is a ton of stuff that is a grift that will die off and gives it a bad name so I temper my excitement of it around most people because it's unpopular to root for the tech.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He's the best for unbiased info when new models drop and news drops. Love that channel.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I think it's that people understand that 99% of green text stories are not real, so the reply is just saying yo if this is real, go to a doc.

Maybe I'm wrong tho

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, someone else commented with their financials and they look really good, so while I certainly agree that they are overvalued because we are in an AI training bubble, I don't see it popping for a few years, especially given that they are selling the shovels. every big player in the space is set on orders of magnitude of additional compute for the next 2 years or more. It doesn't matter if the company they sold gpus to fails if they already sold them. Something big that unexpected would have to happen to upset that trajectory right now and I don't see it because companies are in the exploratory stage of ai tech so no one knows what doesn't work until they get the computer they need. I could be wrong, but that's what I see as a watcher of ai news channels on YouTube.

The co founder of open AI just got a billion dollars for his new 3 month old AI start up. They are going to spend that money on talent and compute. X just announced a data center with 100,000 gpus for grok2 and plans to build the largest in the world I think? But that's Elon, so grains of salt and all that are required there. Nvidia are working with robotics companies to make AI that can train robots virtually to do a task and in the real world a robot will succeed first try. No more Boston dynamics abuse compilation videos. Right now agentic ai workflow is supposed to be the next step, so there will be overseer ai algorithms to develop and train.

All that is to say there is a ton of work that requires compute for the next few years.

{Opinion here} -- I feel like a lot of people are seeing grifters and a wobbly gpt4o launch and calling the game too soon. It takes time to deliver the next product when it's a new invention in its infancy and the training parameters are scaling nearly logarithmically from gen to gen.

I'm sure the structuring of payment for the compute devices isn't as simple as my purchase of a gaming GPU from microcenter, but Nvidia are still financially sound. I could see a lot of companies suffering from this long term but nvidia will be The player in AI compute, whatever that looks like, so they are going to bounce back and be fine.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I'm not sure, these companies are building data centers with so many gpus that they have to be geo located with respect to the power grid because if it were all done in one place it would take the grid down.

And they are just building more.

[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Thank you for this post with information.

Yeah, the info I was speaking from was mostly from a concern for the seraronin syndrome, not from hard evidence because like you said, it's an emerging area of study.

I did just see a study a few days ago, coincidentally, where the abstract said they found a 3 to 6 months period of time from last dose of an SSRI before it stopped interfering with shrooms trips.

Found it again: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37291890/

Interested in your thoughts.

I haven't delved too deep into this topic because everything I have read ranges from you won't get anything from it to its actual dangerous for you.

view more: next ›