this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
530 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

...replacing the previously hydraulic version.

Insert obligatory welcome statement here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egeres@lemmy.world 87 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think they specifically chose that to display that it has no "forward" axis, robots don't need to be 100% anthropomorphic and follow our biological limitations, this is a very significant evolution in design that will allow for better mobility

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'd go further to argue that it's very necessary for robots to have even more mobility such as wheels to take advantage of momentum and increase efficiency. There's a reason the wheel was invented, things like bicycles, wheelbarrows, etc.

The ANYmal wheeled legged robot is an example of that.

https://newatlas.com/robotics/anymal-swiss-mile-quadruped-wheeled-standing-robot/

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'd argue that the wheel was invented not because "walking" was inefficient, but because flesh is weak and gets tired.

A robot doesn't have that weakness. It thinks nothing of running five hours at high speed if necessary. It has no need of wheels if it can just Gump it cross country with cargo on his back a la Death Stranding.

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

A robot doesn’t have that weakness.

Robots have battery capacity limitations, they get "tired" in a different way. Your claim is true if you invent a battery that never runs out of power.

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

But does walking necessarily use more energy than rolling?

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

Good point well made. I hadn't considered that.

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

but because flesh is weak and gets tired.

From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh it disgusted me

I craved the strength and certianty of steel I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine

[–] egeres@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Yes, very good point!

I wonder if someday in the future we might use reinforcement learning to iterate over different mechanical designs to explore even more exotic combinations of wheels, springs, hydraulic pistons, steel wires, legs and joints (optimizing for metrics like mobility etc). I even wonder if flexible joints made out of hard rubber could offer any advantages on bipedal motion

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They might be able to ride bikes at some point.

I think the benefits to making them humanoid are underrated in this comment section.