Technology

59589 readers

3300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

580

Mercedes becomes the first automaker to sell autonomous cars in the U.S. that don't come with a requirement that drivers watch the road (fortune.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MichaelTen@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

229 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Assuming a functional legal system, they'd be liable for damages if they lie about product safety.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's gonna do the people murdered by an algorithm a lot of good... /s

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can't have a babysitter following every human to make sure they don't do something dangerous. Except for high risk areas, liability is the most practical option.

[–] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe, like, regulation?

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So you want to read 50 page regulation about how to boil water in your home because boiling water can hurt people?

And how do you regulate AI when you have no idea how it works or what could go wrong. Not as if politicians are AI experts. Driving itself is already heavily regulated, the AI has to follow traffic rules just like anyone else, if that is what you are thinking.

[–] DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why do you believe that judges (or even juries made of lay people) can make sense of the very things that you’re so confident legislators or regulators cannot?

I’m not saying regulation is perfect, and as a result, certainly there is a role for judicial review. But come on, man…lots of non sequiturs and straw dogs in your argument.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Quite often, juries don't have to rule on technical matters. Juries will have available internal communications of the company, testimonies of the engineers working on the project etc. If safety concerns were being ignored, you can usually find enough witnesses and documents proving so.

On the other hand, how do you even begin to regulate something that is only in the process of being invented? What would the regulation look like?