this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
907 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Instagram is profiting from several ads that invite people to create nonconsensual nude images with AI image generation apps, once again showing that some of the most harmful applications of AI tools are not hidden on the dark corners of the internet, but are actively promoted to users by social media companies unable or unwilling to enforce their policies about who can buy ads on their platforms.

While parent company Meta’s Ad Library, which archives ads on its platforms, who paid for them, and where and when they were posted, shows that the company has taken down several of these ads previously, many ads that explicitly invited users to create nudes and some ad buyers were up until I reached out to Meta for comment. Some of these ads were for the best known nonconsensual “undress” or “nudify” services on the internet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of things I might not like that aren't illegal.

I'm interested in thr thought experiment this has brought up, but I don't want us to get caught in a reactionary fervor because of AI.

AI will make this easier to do, but people have been clipping magazines and celebrities have had photoshops fakes created since both mediums existed. This isn't new, but it is being commoditized.

My take is that these pictures shouldn't be illegal to own or create, but they should be illegal to profit off of and distribute, meaning these tools specifically designed and marketed for it would be banned. If someone wants to tinker at home with their computer, yoipl never be able to ban that, and you'll never be able to ban sexual fantasy.

[–] misc@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think it should be illigal even photoshops of celebs they too are human and have emotions.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I get that it’s creepy but that’s a dark path you want to walk down. Think about how that would have to be enforced.

[–] misc@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would say like how cp is enforced as some of these ai fakes might even involve kids .

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

That’s a great example though, because truthfully digital cp is incredibly difficult to enforce, and some of the laws that have been proposed to make it easier have been incredibly controversial due to how violating they are to people’s privacy.