Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1550

FCC restores net neutrality rules that ban blocking and throttling in 3-2 vote (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Federal Communications Commission voted 3–2 to impose net neutrality rules today, restoring the common-carrier regulatory framework enforced during the Obama era and then abandoned while Trump was president.

The rules prohibit Internet service providers from blocking and throttling lawful content and ban paid prioritization.

"Consumers have made clear to us they do not want their broadband provider cutting sweetheart deals, with fast lanes for some services and slow lanes for others," FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said at today's meeting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Right but if everyone sends 16 petabtyes a month the internet would collapse. Data caps do absolutely work to reduce bandwidth on a network scale. Bandwidth is measured in mbps. Limit the Mb and you reduce the necessary bandwidth.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

but if everyone sent 16PB a month they would have some bomb ass connections as well, and i would sure hope as hell that it would hold up.

I dont even want to calculate how fast a connection would need to be for that to be a datacap.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

More than 6 gigabytes per second

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

ok so basically fucking impossible. Cool.

Even 10 gig would only net you 1 and a bit gigs.

You would need 50 gig to saturate that properly.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

For context 16 petabytes per month is about(slightly more than) 6 gigabytes per second. Also internet was designed during times when computers were super expensive and 100% utilization was norm.

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

You already buy "up to" a certain speed. When the network is congested, you just deal with it.

Trying to make people budget their internet usage is stupid and pointless.