Technology

59534 readers

3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

524

ByteDance prefers TikTok shutdown in US if legal options fail, sources say (www.reuters.com)

submitted 7 months ago by kinther@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

204 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Buttons@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If TikTok's purpose is to spread Chinese propaganda, can't they just find a US Citizen that can run the website for them?

"Yeah, it's my personal website where I exercise my 1st Amendment rights, also it has 100 million daily users and I happen to agree with China on a lot of things." If a US Citizen were to say this, there would be nothing illegal about it I think?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We are talking about the same country right? The US committed the fucking Tuskegee experiments, MK ultra, and more recently Gitmo as a whole. If some dumbfuck wants to be a Chinese puppet I wouldnt put it past the feds to off em, shame they commited suicide by shooting themself in the back of the head twelve times with a shotgun.

[–] Buttons@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, but I'm more interested in intra-legal reasons this couldn't be done.

I'm sure they could find 2, 3, or 3000 US Citizens who are willing to sell out to China, and then TikTok would be owned by US Citizens, but would still be doing what China wants.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I was moreso pointing out the obvious and quick solution. On a more legal situation, I suspect that said individual could be taken down as a foreign agent, most of the laws around that shit from the cold war are still on the books. The fact of the matter is youre are coming at this from the perspective that we dont have laws around what foreign agents are allowed to do, Americans can certainly be foreign agents just ask my 2x great grandfather who was snitching on the Bund who were almost all American born.

[–] firadin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Well China is refusing to divest, i.e. sell it to a US owner so clearly that's not an option for them. If it was about the money they would have.