this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
515 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Ah yes, that will solve the problem

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (12 children)

Wait, is there another psyops software the CCP has deployed in the US?

[–] BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (11 children)

Probably plenty. Tik tok is just the biggest owned by a foreign government that also is showing pretty immediate extreme negative effects on children’s attention spans and learning capabilities.

But people are still gonna whine because they’re 25 year olds who need to watch 80 videos of unboxing shoes in 4 minutes . That’s really the only pro tik tok argument there is.

[–] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

It sets a pretty chilling precedent that non-American competition can be forced to sell to Americans for (insert arbitrary reason here).

I am in favor of TikTok at least becoming restricted to adults only if not outright banned, just warning about the consequences of doing it this way.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's owned by the CCP who is currently trying to undermine our election. It tried to do it in Taiwan where I currently live.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's owned by the CCP who is currently trying to undermine our election

Not that this may not be true, but the USA undermines it's own foundation of democracy

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

While the US government is not perfect, it still is OUR own government. The CCP is a literal adversary.

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So it's ok when Republicans undermine democracy... As long as they are not Chinese, got it

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Some of the republicans are already compromised by Putin. Certainly not ok.

[–] BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wtf kind of response is that? “The Chinese government should get a say in our government because our government isn’t perfect.”

Nothing but Chinese shills or boys here. It’s wild anyone is stupid enough to say this

[–] exanime@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago

Hopefully the response is "the USA is basically 110% hypocritical here having actually intervened and destroyed the democracy of many countries before"

I've said many times.bfore I agree the Chinese government is bad and cannot be trusted, but let's pretend the USA government is trust worthy

Nothing but Chinese shills or boys here. It’s wild anyone is stupid enough to say this

All I see here are people who can't read critically and whose brains seem to only work on fallacies

[–] BlueJayOakerson@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago

It really doesn’t set a bad precedent forcing a foreign adversary to have less control over the US population. We should really force the sale of a lot of Chinese properties in the US as well. A foreign government should not have so much control over rental and housing prices in the US.

Why are you pro foreign adversary controlling the daily lives of Americans? It’s a very odd stance to take and openly say unless you’re not American obviously.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)