Technology

59605 readers

3302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

637

Google lays off hundreds of 'Core' employees, moves some positions to India and Mexico (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 6 months ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google is laying off more employees and hiring for their roles outside of the U.S.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"Wealth and power are exactly the same". This is the claim I'm disputing. If there are places where money and power are in conflict, then they can't be the same. Your analysis of a situation will be have holes in it if this is not considered.

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

If you’d care to dive deeper I’d like to be challenged on this; but your previous example of “maintaining things can avoid unnecessary costs later” (as I understand it) doesn’t have anything to do with “money and power can be in conflict”.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Shortsightedness driven by greed does not, in any way, negate money equaling power.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then let me attack it from a different direction: can you have power in a society that does not have money?

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Within that isolated society? Sure.

If your goal was to argue semantics then I don't know why I'm entertaining this. Yes, in an imaginary society that is 1) somehow not influenced by modern society and 2) somehow also avoids currency - power dynamics will obviously take different shapes.

Do you realize how meaningless that example is?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

I'm working outword to find a path in.

If a society can have power without money, then can the two overlap perfectly in any society?

To use a more concrete example, how do unions ever have power in our society? They tend not to have money, or at least very little in proportion to the business owners.