this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
51 points (77.4% liked)

Games

16806 readers
907 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Why watch a video with such a pointlessly clickbait title?

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because it is a good video by a channel that makes quality game related content.

Its not the fault of a channel that google made an atrocious sorting algorithm.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They could have made the title about the fact that FPS wasn't a term at the time instead of using a question that is worded in the present tense.

"What genre was Doom when it was released"

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I share your frustration, but YouTube offers you a choice: use honest titles and suffer at the hands of the algorithm, or use clickbait and get access to a much wider audience.

If the creator needs to use clickbait in order to have the funding to produce higher quality videos, I find it hard to hold them personally responsible for the systemic issues of the platform.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And that's fine, I just won't watch those videos. The channels I tend to watch have pretty clear titles, e.g. Gamer's Nexus and Digital Foundry are awesome.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'll take this one: Wolfenstein Clone.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

It makes no sense to call something a clone when it was made by the same studio that made the original. Very few wanted to call quake a doom clone.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's an interesting and entertaining video. That was the reason for me at least

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How did you know that it would be entertaining before watching the video?

What the hell is the passage of time anyway?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's from Ahoy, that's how I knew

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Now imagine someone doesn't have any idea who Ahoy is and you might understand why they wouldn't want to just watch a video with a clickbait title.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You asked why someone would want to watch it and I answered why I wanted to lol. At no point had I trouble understanding why someone wouldn't want to

Yup, I've never watched one of their videos, and if this is how they make their headlines, I probably never will.

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

What about the title is clickbaity? There's no "the answer is going to surprise you", no surprised face in the thumbnail, no "you won't believe what happened next". The video examines the question in the title.