this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
51 points (77.4% liked)

Games

16785 readers
837 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

I ended up watching it, and I thought it was generally just okay. Basically, here's the tldr from what I remember:

  1. Doom was originally a "virtual reality adventure" game - I guess that was the terminology for "first person" game back in the early 90s
  2. Doom clone became a thing for a couple years until Quake came along, at which point "Quake killer" was the term used; just prior to this, "first person shoot'em up" was used
  3. Some random discussion about what Doom would've been called if it didn't get popular - not sure what that speculation is worth imo, maybe trying to discard biases?
  4. conclusion that Doom was actually an action RPG? Because it has similar gameplay as gauntlet? Gauntlet was a hack and slash dungeon crawler, not an action RPG, so the proper conclusion imo is "first person shoot'em up dungeon crawler," the "action RPG" argument came out of left field

So that's my take. I don't think it was a particularly noteworthy watch, and I'm not particularly motivated to subscribe to watch more. It was okay though, so I'm not going to avoid the channel or anything.