this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
369 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

76460 readers
3664 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RiQuY@lemm.ee 85 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Now they partner with OpenAI after banning AI answers provided by users? Wow, such hypocrisy https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/policy-generative-ai-e-g-chatgpt-is-banned

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 82 points 2 years ago

Now they're getting paid, so fuck you!

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That exactly tracks. You can't feed answers from an AI into an AI. It gets all incesty (technical term). So they have to ban user submitted AI answers.

[–] blurg@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yet use AI (possibly) to determine users' AI answers.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

My new anti AI-detection AI is designed to write in ways not detectable by current AI-detection AI.

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It gets all incesty (technical term)

I, too, am very technically specific about the porn I watch

[–] OuterRem@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Were they trying to avoid having AI produced output sold as LLM input along with their human user generated content? I wonder if this was some big picture decision or pure coincidence.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Banning AI answers was reasonable though. People were posting were too many not verified and incorrect code snippets that entire quality of the platform would decrease. AI still makes more mistakes than humans that provide responses on stack.