this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
228 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

62853 readers
6344 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (18 children)

Cars suck but I’ve been spending too much time in them and now I’m too stupid to explain why

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (16 children)

Not sure exactly why you're getting downvoted as that was essentially the point of the article:

Flame retardant chemicals off-gas or leach from the seat and interior fabrics into the air, — especially in hot weather, when car interiors can reach 150 degrees Fahrenheit.

Advocates argue that the risks of these chemicals outweigh the benefits.

But health researchers have found that the average U.S. child has lost up to 5 IQ points from exposure to flame retardants in cars and furniture. And adults with the highest levels of flame retardants in their blood face a risk of death by cancer that is four times greater than those with the lowest levels, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association.

[–] jecht360@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As for why they're getting downvoted, criticizing cars or the use of cars tends to get a lot of negative feedback.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)