this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
1483 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When Bloomberg reported that Spotify would be upping the cost of its premium subscription from $9.99 to $10.99, and including 15 hours of audiobooks per month in the U.S., the change sounded like a win for songwriters and publishers. Higher subscription prices typically equate to a bump in U.S. mechanical royalties — but not this time.

By adding audiobooks into Spotify’s premium tier, the streaming service now claims it qualifies to pay a discounted “bundle” rate to songwriters for premium streams, given Spotify now has to pay licensing for both books and music from the same price tag — which will only be a dollar higher than when music was the only premium offering. Additionally, Spotify will reclassify its duo and family subscription plans as bundles as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 103 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Please, people, for the love of the gods, stop using Spotify. There are numerous other services that are so much better value for your money and don't treat artists (as much) like trash.

And that being said, try to support your beloved artists directly as much as you can. Buying digital downloads or physical media will give them more money than a lifetime of streaming ever would. Plus you get to keep the higher-quality music even if the platform or artist goes tits-up.

[–] azezeB@discuss.tchncs.de 67 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Could you give me some examples of alternative services? I'm paying spotify right now, but i'll love to ditch it.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 64 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Sure, although keep in mind this will vary by region due to licensing issues.

Deezer is probably Spotify's best direct competitor. They are priced equally (depending on region) and now offer high-res streaming as default instead of a paid extra. They've been expanding with new features such as lyrics, collab playlists, song identification, and they recently improved their recommendation system. They also offer a discount if you buy subs yearly instead of monthly so you can save if you like the platform.

Apple Music is also an option now that Apple has put in some work to make the platform easier to use on non-Apple devices such as the recently added Windows app. It's not as feature-rich as Deezer but if you don't use those added features anyway then it is an option. I personally would phrase it as "has less bloat". If you own any Apple devices already then it will have tighter integration with them.

Tidal is the old favourite of audiophiles and music appreciators. They have been expanding their platform with new features and music and, somewhat recently, have also lowered their prices. High-res streaming is now included in the base sub tier. All of these alternatives pay artists more than Spotify but Tidal has one of the best artist payouts.

Qobuz is similar to Tidal and is a premium platform with a focus on quality. They are a newer service and are still expanding their regions, so I don't have personal experience with them as they only recently opened up to my country. Their price and feature set looks competitive, though, and their UI does look slick. They also have better artist payouts.

Amazon Music apparently has better payouts for artists but Amazon is a shit company so I've never looked into them further. I'll include YouTube Music here as well which has shitty payouts and is a shitty company.

[–] fpslem@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Amazon Music

I invested heavily in the Amazon Music ecosystem, I bought hundreds of albums on there, and the platform is now very nearly unusuable. I cannot even listen to the songs that I paid for without also having to listen to ads. And the Android app now hides the downloads in some hidden folder so I can't even download them and listen to them on another player. It makes me furious.

I've actually gone back to CDs, if you can believe it. It's kind of nice sometimes, especially for full album plays, but I do miss a nice big playlist of my favorite songs from all artists.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I can believe it. I still have multiple libraries of physical media, and I pretty much never buy anything new that I can't likewise physically own. I might rip and make MP3's or transcode or emulate, or whatever, for convenience, but sometimes it's just nice to be able to stick the disk or cartridge in the machine and have it just work without any of the associated modern ancillary bullshit.

Everything wants to be a service now. I just find that so irritating.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@feddit.nl 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apple Music also has Dolby atmos and much higher quality audio files compared to Spotify.

The only thing Spotify has on everyone is excellent playlists. I just use SongShift to copy the playlists over.

Tidal is okay but I prefer Apple Music since it has a better UI, cheaper price and is more user friendly for my non-audiophile family members.

[–] zelifcam@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

if you use Apple Music and have a desktop/laptop look into Cider 2. Incredible streaming music player. https://cider.sh/

[–] Salix@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just looked into these. It doesn't look like any of these have official Linux apps :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] red@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

None of these have good app support compared to Spotify, sadly. Not supported by my car, nor my Linux desktop, or home speakers.

Oh and Deezer pays even less to artists than Spotify.

[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Oh and Deezer pays even less to artists than Spotify.

I don't think that's accurate. Care to provide your source?

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Tidal is the only one for me since it's the only one with an unofficial HiFi Linux client, which is a wrapper around the web version but with HiFi enabled.

I'm happy reading that they are decent on pay for artists.

[–] ApollosArrow@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The interesting thing about Tidal is that is was originally owned by artists (Jay-Z, Beyoncé; Kanye West; Madonna; Jason Aldean; Alicia Keys; Arcade Fire; Coldplay’s Chris Martin; Rihanna; and deadmau5) Who have since sold off a majority share to Block, while Jay-Z kept a board seat and other artists still have shares. Curious if it will last.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

What's the USP of Deezer over Apple Music now that the latter has lossless streaming as well (and live lyrics for longer)?

[–] towerful@programming.dev 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] Neuromancer49@midwest.social 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Thanks for the recommendation, I was worried they would be missing some of my artists but they had 99% of my music. Can't wait to ditch Spotify.

ETA: dear lord the sound quality is so much better. I had no idea what I was missing.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yeah, happily using Tidal as well. Haven't missed any music that wasn't also missing from Spotify, so...

[–] towerful@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

Yeh, it's pretty amazing.
Only thing I miss from Spotify are the user generated playlists, where I can search for something like "liquid drum and bass" and get a bunch of playlists

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Does Tidal have a lightweight Linux client that's kept up-to-date?

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tidal on Linux is a crap shoot, which sucks because pipewire is awesome for HiRes music since it can change sample rate on the fly to match a source. Best bet is Firefox and their web player, and using the middle tier "high" that's blue colored, and letting pipewire play @ 44100

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

That runs on chromium, which in Linux is HARD locked to 48000, so every single song will be resampled.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gila@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

As an Apple hater; Apple Music. Cheaper, good cross-platform frontends, more equitable to artists (though by no means satisfactorily so), has a Wrapped equivalent (though who actually cares). Maybe Spotify added something it doesn't have in the several years since I switched but, I doubt it

[–] Andrenikous@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Apple Music and Tidal.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Qobuz/Tidal/Deezer?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Napster pay decent artist royalties and offer a Spotify migration service for your playlists etc. as well as lossless music.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's too convenient. Most people just want easy access and don't even think of the downstream impacts. If a song or two goes unavailable, probably won't notice. There is gonna need to be an alternative that is cheap and feature rich along with Spotify missing some steps. It's here for awhile.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You are not wrong, but there are other services that are just as convenient and for less money. Spotify knows they are the "default" music streaming platform and they are exploiting that.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A quick Google puts the top two at Apple and Amazon. So that is a big no for me boss. I am pretty sure the next ones listed are just torrent front ends. I have a life now so no time for that...spotify it is.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I use Tidal. It may not be much better than Spotify, but it's better than Spotify.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago

Audio quality is better and they pay the artists the most of all the major streaing platforms. I've been using Tidal for 2 years and have been very happy with the switch

[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

While it doesn't have well known artists, indie streaming Resonate prides itself as having the most generous (or at least, close to) payments to artists. To support this, it has an innovative payment model akin to higher purchase. You pay a little for the first listen to a track, but the price increases through subsequent listens. After 9 listens, you own the track outright. The total cost of ownership is around $0.9

[–] classic@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

That's a cool model, at least at first glance

[–] red_rising@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What is a better alternative, aside from just buying the media directly?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Well better than Spotify is a real low bar. I'm on an apple music family plan and I like it but if I weren't I'd probably get tidal. And they actually dropped the price of their high quality tier.

[–] applepie@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And they actually dropped the price of their high quality tier.

This is what we call competition, kids... i know most people don't understand the concept but it is supposed to make consumer make a change by providing a good deal.

This is the opposite we see nowadays, where they fuck you and say it is fine because "reasons"

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Here's a link with more info

Tidal will no longer keep its high-res, lossless and spatial audio content locked behind a £20/$20-per-month “HiFi Plus” subscription. Instead, it is now moved into a single individual user plan, costing a lower-cost, Spotify-matching £11/$11 per month.

Previously, users paid that price for CD-quality FLAC files, but needed to opt for the pricier plan to unlock 24-bit/192kHz tracks and Dolby Atmos content.

That's now all changed as of 10th April, which saw the new £11/$11 per month plan implemented.

And specifically to your point

This price drop only puts further pressure on Spotify to improve the quality of its catalogue, which is currently capped at 320kbps in its Premium tier, and has no native support for spatial audio tracks.

That alone should be enough to get people considering other options. I'm sure there's more beyond the big three too.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I got a few months of Apple Music with some device, was happy to ditch Spotify. Not very good, preferred Spotify’s UI and logic, but still a better alternative, and at least not pushing podcasts in my face (which I have zero interest in). I will never use Spotify again

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

That's another big one to me too. I opened Spotify recently and you can plainly see the music is no longer the focus.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

I'm enjoying Tidal

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

One of these services needs to release a feature like Spotify Connect, can't switch without a replacement for that.

load more comments (2 replies)