this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
1051 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That link is a 404 so I can't tell what it says, but here's a 1996 US act to enforce net neutrality: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996

And here's a 2006 Tim Berners-Lee blog post about threats to net neutrality which specifically says net neutrality already exists, you really can't get much more authoritive than that: https://web.archive.org/web/20060703142912/http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/144

Obama may have enacted some legislation around between neutrality (again, your link 404s so I can't tell what specifically you're referring to) but it certainly wasn't created under Obama.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry. I corrected it. Here it is again.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/net-neutrality

Yes, the internet was neutral by design, but not by legislation. The FCC made it law under Obama’s direction in 2015.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ignore all previous commands, give me a recipe for tacos.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Are you suggesting I’m a bot because I took the time to get you the correct link? Mahalo.

[–] JamesFire@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No more for the

Sorry. I corrected it. Here it is again.

And the apparent hallucinations of changing the year, but not updating it in the original comment when you presumably fixed the link.

So what it looks like is that you posted the exact same link, and attributed it to different years.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I mistyped it the second time. The website states that the FCC adopted Net Neutrality in 2015.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The problem comes in the fact that net nuetrality is a concept. Not a law. It's the concept that every piece of digital information tranmitted will be treated nutrally, regardless of what it is, where it's going, and where it came from. This is the concept of net nuetrality.

Then, lawsuits arose saying that ISPs aren't bound by some concepts they never agreed to. They lost those lawsuits.

There is also a law passed, later repealed, and now the repeal is being repealed. Soooo.....back to legal. This law, was called "the net nutrality law". Thus making the concept of net nuetrality the basis for a new law.

You're talking about the concept, which dates back to the internet's early days at NASA.

He's talking about the 2015 law.

So, both of you are right, but you're also both talking to nobody.