this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
85 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new paper suggests diminishing returns from larger and larger generative AI models. Dr Mike Pound discusses.

The Paper (No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data): https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04125

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boyi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

no matter our computational techniques, the diminishing returns in predictive precision is reached far sooner than we achieve general intelligence

That's very bold presumption. How can they be so sure of this, that any future models can't tackle the issue? have they got proof or something.

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

No, they just calculate with increased size of the training roster.. it's not that complicated. Which is a fair presumption as that is how we've increased the predictive precision so far.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It seems far more bold to presume that general intelligence will be created any time soon when current machine learning is nowhere close.