this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
65 points (95.8% liked)

Games

16806 readers
674 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
65
It looks like Rockstar is gearing up to release Red Dead Redemption 1 on PC. (twitter.com)
submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Has it not been released on PC all this time? That's wild. And lazy. I don't know why people give this company so much credit anymore.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I gave up on Rockstar once they canceled GTA:V expansions for all the shark card GTA Online bullshit. Could have been awesome, but they gated so much content behind that shitty online mode.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Yup, GTA V had a pretty mediocre story imo, and I was excited to have a story DLC that was actually decent since the engine was pretty good. But no.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I hear you there.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 11 points 6 months ago

There was a lot of talk about RDR's code being duct taped together and being really difficult to undo for a port, took them until recently to really start doing so in earnest, so maybe they've wanted to for a while but are just now seeing the fruits of that labor.

[–] DoctorButts@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 6 months ago

Not like I support Rockstar since I think that company is dogshit. But how is it lazy? They've been milking PC sales of RDR2 for years now. Seems like they didn't want RDR1 to compete against RDR2. It is more calculated than lazy.

[–] pkmkdz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Iirc, your best bet was to emulate the switch port.
The game runs on xbox (xenia) and ps3 (rpcs3) emulators but needs really beefy pc and still has issues.

[–] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't say it needs a really beefy PC. I built mine 5 years ago and it ran at 60fps at 1440p in Xenia without any major issues.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Yup, I gave up waiting and dug out my old Xbox 360 to play it. I honestly hadn't heard about it until RDR2 came out and wanted to play the first. It was a fantastic experience, but I really would've preferred to play it on my PC, and I would've bought a copy from them instead of the used copy I found in eBay. Their loss I guess...